Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-24 Thread Georg Baum
Am Montag 23 April 2007 22:32 schrieb Marco Herrn: Hi, On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in

Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-23 Thread Marco Herrn
Hi, On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in debian. LyX will omit the extension for LaTeX export if

Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-23 Thread Marc J. Driftmeyer
I think George is referring to LyX not converting the images, but relying on external services your current system has or could have to accomplish this task. For instance, JPEG, PNG, GIF, PGM, etc has gimp-remote be its editor and the system's current viewer associated with the extension handle

Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-22 Thread Georg Baum
Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in debian. LyX will omit the extension for LaTeX export if that is possible. Did you really try to omit the extension with LyX

Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-22 Thread Sven Hoexter
package lyx tags 329331 -fixed-upstream thanks On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:10PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Hi, Since LyX 1.4.0 it is not possible anymore to omit the extension in LyX, so this bug is no longer applicable and should have been closed with the first 1.4.x release in debian.

Bug#329331: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#329331: Really???

2007-04-22 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2007 18:11 schrieb Sven Hoexter: Sounds like the behaviour upstream prefers is the contradiction of what Marco would like to have. Is there a way we can agree to close this bug? Like a technical reason why it's not a good idea to implement the wished behaviour? I ask