user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags #329701 close-20060531
thanks
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:43:04AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> adduser maintainership would like to see this discussed on
> debian-devel. Please state your case there, and I'll decide what to do
> afterwards.
Since the original submitte
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:43:04AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:46:55AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> adduser maintainership would like to see this discussed on
> debian-devel. Please state your case there, and I'll decide what to do
> afterwards.
I personally don't care too
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:46:55AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:40:31AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
> > > One additional possibility is for adduser to support an interface to
> > > add users/groups in this new
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:40:31AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
> > One additional possibility is for adduser to support an interface to
> > add users/groups in this new range, which would involve a new
> > configuration option and at l
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Which change is suggested to adduser?
> >
> > The change of LAST_SYSTEM_UID in /etc/adduser.conf from 999 to 499.
>
> /etc/adduser.conf is a conffile. The range 100-999 is laid down in
> policy 9.2.2, so changing the default in adduser is out of the
>
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:08:50AM +0100, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
> Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Not having a clue about NIS and never having had any sizeable amount
> > of local users, I'd like to have an "executive summary" for this bug
> > report.
> >
> > Which change is suggested t
6 matches
Mail list logo
