Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2006-09-07 Thread Peter Colberg
Hello Florian, On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:45:59PM +0200, Florian Ragwitz wrote: On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:19:37PM +0200, Peter Colberg wrote: Package: wmmaiload Version: 2.2.1-1 [...] [...] I have since been using your latest package version with my atime patch applied without

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2006-04-14 Thread Peter Colberg
Package: wmmaiload Version: 2.2.1-1 Hello Florian, On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote: I mailed the upstream author some time ago and told him about your patch and the problems I'm experiencing with the latest release. I didn't get a reply yet, but I just pinged

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2006-04-14 Thread Florian Ragwitz
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:19:37PM +0200, Peter Colberg wrote: Package: wmmaiload Version: 2.2.1-1 Hello Florian, On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 04:43:39PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote: I mailed the upstream author some time ago and told him about your patch and the problems I'm experiencing

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2005-11-30 Thread Florian Ragwitz
Hello Peter, I mailed the upstream author some time ago and told him about your patch and the problems I'm experiencing with the latest release. I didn't get a reply yet, but I just pinged hin again about that. Regards, Flo -- BOFH excuse #164: root rot signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2005-10-17 Thread Peter Colberg
Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:51:22AM +0200, Florian Ragwitz wrote: I can confirm your bug with the current version in Debian, but I just noticed that there were some new upstream releases. I'll package them first to verify if the bug still exists with the new releases. The code for MBOX

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2005-10-17 Thread Peter Colberg
Hi, sorry for the noise... Relating to my previous e-mail, I will have to correct myself. I experience major problems with the new upstream version (which I somehow anticipated looking at the Changelog and seeing few fixes but lots of code restructuring). In the case of checking for mail in

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2005-10-16 Thread Florian Ragwitz
tags 330970 +confirmed thanks Hello, thanks for reporting this issue and sorry for the long delay. I can confirm your bug with the current version in Debian, but I just noticed that there were some new upstream releases. I'll package them first to verify if the bug still exists with the new

Bug#330970: wmmaiload: Preserve atime after mbox check

2005-09-30 Thread Peter Colberg
Package: wmmaiload Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch When checking for new mail in an MBOX folder, wmmaiload continuously resets the atime of the respective file. This breaks MUAs which check for new mail with a comparison of the access time of a folder with the date of the messages