tags 331391 = confirmed
thanks
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Iti s an sarge - etch upgrade problem if anything, let's remove them for now,
and once we sorted out the module build issues, we can always readd them fori
etch if really needed.
It'd be convenient if
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 02:29:59PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 = confirmed
thanks
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Iti s an sarge - etch upgrade problem if anything, let's remove them for
now,
and once we sorted out the module build
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:04:16AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 05:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:58:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
[EMAIL
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 07:35:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:04:16AM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther
On Friday 14 October 2005 02:09, Steve Langasek wrote:
i386, alpha, s390, sparc, powerpc only use it for 2.4 kernels.
Does this mean that these archs are now using linux-image-$foo for 2.6
kernels
Yes.
or that we've regressed to hard-coding kernel versions in
places?
No, just a check
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Also, if the user don't upgrade those, nothing major will break, apart from
the fact that he has a few unused bits on his harddisk.
So, i vote for simply removing them, and
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Nope, the latest are now provided by the linux-2.6 package as a legacy
compatibility thingy and depend on the linux-image 2.6.12 kernels. I think
from now on, and with the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Also, if the user don't upgrade those, nothing major will break, apart
from
the fact that he has a few
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Also, if the user don't upgrade those, nothing major
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/packages/base-installer/kernelgrep kernel-image *
alpha.sh: echo kernel-image-$version-$SMP
amd64.sh: echo
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:58:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/packages/base-installer/kernelgrep kernel-image *
alpha.sh: echo
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:58:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
The only issue here was stopping support for kernel-HEADER-2.6-* metapackages,
not kernel-IMAGE-2.6-*, as those
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:58:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/packages/base-installer/kernelgrep kernel-image *
alpha.sh: echo
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 01:43:25AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:58:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I reviewed base-installer for use of kernel-image-2.6.* metapackages.
It's still used by amd64, arm, m68k, mips, and mipsel:
The only issue here was stopping
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:01:09PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:40:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:57:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 08:04:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:38:42PM +0200, Sven Luther
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:34:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:16:34AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 moreinfo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:56PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Nope, the latest are now provided by the linux-2.6 package as a legacy
compatibility thingy and depend on the linux-image 2.6.12 kernels. I think
from now on, and with the exception of the mips kernels, all 2.6 kernel
related source
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 09:20:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:34:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi ftpmasters,
Hi Horms,
After discussion with the d-i
tags 331391 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:34:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi ftpmasters,
Hi Horms,
After discussion with the d-i team, the 2.6.8 kernel
can now be removed from the archive. Accordinly, please remove
the following packages:
kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:36:41PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
tags 331391 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:34:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
Hi ftpmasters,
Hi Horms,
After discussion with the d-i team, the 2.6.8 kernel
can now be removed from the archive. Accordinly,
22 matches
Mail list logo
