Package: rsh-redone-server
Version: 66-1
Severity: normal
When doing lots of connections in "quick" succession (say, one per
second), then, after a while, connections fails with:
poll: protocol failure in circuit setup
This is not due to the inetd rate limit (which I changed to 1000/minute
f
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:15:43AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> When doing lots of connections in "quick" succession (say, one per
> second), then, after a while, connections fails with:
>
>poll: protocol failure in circuit setup
>
> This is not due to the inetd rate limit (which I changed t
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:40:21AM +0200, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:15:43AM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > Replacing rsh-redone-server by rsh-server fixes this problem completely.
>
> I'll have a look at the difference between rsh-server and
> rsh-redone
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:23:22PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > > Sometimes I get this message in the syslog:
> > >
> > > Oct 6 06:02:47 (none) in.rshd: Connection from cerebro on illegal port 0.
> >
> > This is about the primary connection, not the stderr connection.
>
> Interesting, as I w
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:23:22PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > I'll have a look at the difference between rsh-server and
> > rsh-redone-server. I guess it is because rsh-redone-server lets some
> > sockets linger longer than rsh-server...
>
> Could be the underlying reason, but I run into prob
5 matches
Mail list logo
