On Nov 01, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, if the root filesystem is read-only, then the locking will fail
(you need to open a file read/write to get an exclusive fcntl lock).
Perhaps this is happening to you? If not, please check again that you
Sure, all of this happens when / is
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Nov 01, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, if the root filesystem is read-only, then the locking will fail
(you need to open a file read/write to get an exclusive fcntl lock).
Perhaps this is happening to you? If
On Oct 29, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send complete log.
Here it is. I can reproduce the bug even with a script like:
while read m; do
/sbin/modprobe.real $m
done LIST
(Each command was logged to different files which have been sorted by
PID and reassembled.)
=[
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 19:53 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 29, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please send complete log.
Here it is. I can reproduce the bug even with a script like:
while read m; do
/sbin/modprobe.real $m
done LIST
(Each command was logged to
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this issue some more.
This is a possibility I was aware of when I changed to code
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:24:44PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 10:10 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
And then it fails for ehci-hcd too (which is not loaded at all).
Rusty, do you have other ideas for debugging?
I have reread the bug reports, and meditated on this issue
On Oct 28, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in
the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack.
No luck.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 15:08 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 28, Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter is the simplest option. Please try this patch (it will be in
the next release, too). If it seems to work, please ack.
No luck.
Please send complete log.
I might need to
On Oct 27, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up
to 10 child processes in parallel).
Ok, but it runs modprobe, not ismod, right?
Yes.
As Rusty suggested I wrapped /sbin/modprobe in a logger script, but so
far I have not
On Oct 26, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify, udevd gets a bunch of events and tries to
serialise them into modprobe calls, right? Do you think there
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up
to 10 child processes in parallel).
is any chance it
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:37:54AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 26, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify, udevd gets a bunch of events and tries to
serialise them into modprobe calls, right? Do you think there
There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 21, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
to be the major change
I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
to be the major change between -2 and -4, and I completely
failed in all my attempts to reproduce the problem.
[1]
On Oct 21, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a bit of a poke around this symbols problem.
I puzzeled over it for a while. I began to wonder
if it might be caused byudevsynthesize[1] which seems
to be the major change between -2 and -4, and I completely
failed in all my attempts to
14 matches
Mail list logo
