On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:27:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Anyone care to give this build another spin?
I tried latest svn and it works fine now.
Thanks a lot!
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:27:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> I tried current svn (svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-pam/trunk/pam/), and the
> following issues arose:
> 1) PATH_MAX usage in modules/pam_cracklib/pam_cracklib.c:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../libpam/include
> -I../../libpam
Michael Banck, le Tue 21 Aug 2007 16:27:26 +0200, a écrit :
> debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man5/namespace.conf.5: No such file or
> directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 120, line 333.
>
> which is pretty weird considering that this shouldn't be arch-specific
> at all.
Namespaces are kernel-depen
Hi,
I tried current svn (svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-pam/trunk/pam/), and the
following issues arose:
1) PATH_MAX usage in modules/pam_cracklib/pam_cracklib.c:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../libpam/include
-I../../libpamc/include -g -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -O2 -MT
pam_cracklib.lo
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 06:39:17PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Package: pam
> Version: 0.79-3
> Severity: important
> there was a problem autobuilding your package:
Gar, sorry. This may wait until I package the latest upstream version,
which now has autoconf support; I'm inclined to avoid mess
Package: pam
Version: 0.79-3
Severity: important
Hi,
there was a problem autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of pam_0.79-3 on beethoven by sbuild/hurd-i386 69
Build started at 20051010-1316
**
Checking available s
6 matches
Mail list logo
