Bug#333479: this was a serious error

2006-05-21 Thread Albert Cahalan
I lost all sorts of apps that Debian no longer packages. I even lost penguineyes. Want to package it for me? I guess it was wrong to rely on shared libraries. Debian should use static linking. About the only thing stable is the kernel system call interface. Really, it's not cool to break old bin

Bug#333479: this was a serious error

2006-05-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Albert Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I lost all sorts of apps that Debian no longer packages. > I even lost penguineyes. Want to package it for me? > > I guess it was wrong to rely on shared libraries. Debian > should use static linking. About the only thing stable > is the kernel system

Bug#333479: this was a serious error

2006-05-21 Thread Albert Cahalan
On 5/21/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Albert Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I lost all sorts of apps that Debian no longer packages. > I even lost penguineyes. Want to package it for me? > > I guess it was wrong to rely on shared libraries. Debian > should use stati

Bug#333479: this was a serious error

2006-05-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 09:33:47PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > On 5/21/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"Albert Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I lost all sorts of apps that Debian no longer packages. > >> I even lost penguineyes. Want to package it for me? > >>

Bug#333479: this was a serious error

2006-05-21 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
"Albert Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > old stuff needs libpng2 > new stuff depends on stuff that conflicts with libpng2 > user needs the new stuff, and wants to keep the old stuff Can you give a specific example please? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u