On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
So now the segfaults move another step down the chain, to someone else
running a different application that needs net-snmp built against 0.9.7...
Indeed. Until all have transitioned, segfaults would happen. There was no
other fix for a openssl without
Henrique,
Why are you telling maintainers that you are going to NMU for the openssl
transition? Such NMUs have not been discussed with either the release team
or the QA team, and they would be disruptive of the release team's efforts
to complete the C++ ABI transition for KDE and related
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why are you telling maintainers that you are going to NMU for the openssl
transition? Such NMUs have not been discussed with either the release team
Well, I am not telling maintainer*s*, so far I just filed a single bug
against net-snmp. Because of
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:09:17AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why are you telling maintainers that you are going to NMU for the openssl
transition? Such NMUs have not been discussed with either the release team
Well, I am not
Package: net-snmp
Severity: wishlist
Version: 5.2.1.2-3
I will upload soon a NMU to the 2-day delayed upload queue. The NMU diff is
attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
5 matches
Mail list logo
