Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-26 Thread Hans
Hi Gerd, hello Dann ! I yesterday told you, to give a reply of your clues. Yes, great , it works ! I did not know, that the module bttv now has the opportunity to give additional parameters. Loading bttv with additional parameters type=10 pll=1 tuner=5 works great ! So, the bug was no bug and

Bug#334572: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???)

2005-10-25 Thread Gerd Knorr
What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner, and the pll. Any clue ? Or did I understand something wrong ? I couldn't say. Gerd, do you have a pointer to some documentation that might help Hans? Oh well. pll is a *bttv* insmod option, tuner.ko hasn't and never had

Bug#334572: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???)

2005-10-25 Thread Hans
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2005 11:31 schrieb Gerd Knorr: What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner, and the pll. Any clue ? Or did I understand something wrong ? I couldn't say. Gerd, do you have a pointer to some documentation that might help Hans? Oh well.

Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-24 Thread dann frazier
(re-adding bug address to CC list - please include that on replies) On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 07:32 +0200, Hans wrote: Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2005 21:40 schrieben Sie: On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:27 +0200, Hans wrote: The kernel module tuner.o will not accept additional options, just like

Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-24 Thread Gerd Knorr
Gerd: do you know if the removal of this parameter was intentional? Yes. It's obsolete for years. It simply doesn't work that way with more than one tv card in the system. Boot 2.6.11 and watch the kernel messages ;) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo modinfo tuner $ /sbin/modinfo bttv | grep

Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 17:38 +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote: Gerd: do you know if the removal of this parameter was intentional? Yes. It's obsolete for years. It simply doesn't work that way with more than one tv card in the system. Boot 2.6.11 and watch the kernel messages ;) Thanks Gerd.

Bug#334572: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???)

2005-10-24 Thread dann frazier
[Re-adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gerd to the cc list; please reply to all, not just to me personally] On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:56 +0200, Hans wrote: Hello Danny, thanks for the mail. But this would not solve my problem. What do I have to do ? I have to force the module to a special tuner, and

Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-19 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 20:27 +0200, Hans wrote: The kernel module tuner.o will not accept additional options, just like -type=xx or pll=x. This was in earlier kernel-versions o.k. What was the most recent kernel that worked? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#334572: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6: Module tuner prohibits additional options (i.e. -type=5) , bug ???

2005-10-18 Thread Hans
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k6 Version: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash