Bug#340279: Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A that what you see is not #334613 I again mark is as not found in 3.0-10.1. Sorry, could you rephrase that? Simply look at

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

notfound 334613 3.0-10.1 stop On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: Hi, Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't mean eventually #340279? Could be it too. Let's just say that a

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

ma, 2005-11-28 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: notfound 334613 3.0-10.1 stop On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't mean

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A that what you see is not #334613 I again mark is as not found in 3.0-10.1. Sorry, could you rephrase that? Simply look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkgdata=tetex-binarchive=noversion=dist=unstable The bug you reported

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A that what you see is not #334613 I again mark is as not found in 3.0-10.1. Sorry, could you rephrase that? Simply look at

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: ma, 2005-11-28 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: On 25.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Let's just say that a bug titled Does not configure (aleph+omega failed) doesn't ring a bell, while one titled

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

On 28.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: ma, 2005-11-28 kello 19:22 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, could you rephrase that? Simply look at

Bug#340279: Build problems on sarti (was: Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends)

pe, 2005-11-25 kello 11:38 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti: Dear Debian admins, we need your help with that bug (I've already sent you a message earlier, suspecting hardware problems). Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

On 24.11.05 Martin-Éric Racine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't mean eventually #340279? Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... warning: Could not open

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't mean eventually #340279? Could be it too. Let's just say that a bug titled Does not configure (aleph+omega failed) doesn't ring a bell, while one titled fmtutil-sys

Bug#340279: Build problems on sarti (was: Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends)

Dear Debian admins, we need your help with that bug (I've already sent you a message earlier, suspecting hardware problems). Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 Note that the user mixed things up; it's #340279.

Bug#340279: Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

retitle 340279 fmtutil-sys fails with aleph+omega (on hppa) thanks Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pe, 2005-11-25 kello 10:16 +0100, Hilmar Preusse kirjoitti: Seems to be a container for every failed installation. You didn't mean eventually #340279? Could be it too. Let's just

Bug#340279: Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But you should be aware that the BTS still seems to have problems with the new versioning system: The bug you reported to is marked as Done. It should be displayed below Resolved Bugs. I have reported this as #340713. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster

Bug#334613: failed install prevents building of another package that has tetex-bin as build-depends

Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Failure to install tetex-bin breaks the build-depend requirements of package planner on hppa.