Bug#335486: openssl: FTBFS (ppc64): gcc: '-b' must come at the start of the command line

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 05-Nov-10 00:46, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Could you please try the attached patch? It does 3 things: - Replace the 2 -bpowerpc64-linux by -m64 - Changes the location of linux_ppc64.o in the string to be one field later. It said it's needed for cpuid, while it should be for bn. - Also

Bug#335486: openssl: FTBFS (ppc64): gcc: '-b' must come at the start of the command line

2005-11-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, Could you please try the attached patch? It does 3 things: - Replace the 2 -bpowerpc64-linux by -m64 - Changes the location of linux_ppc64.o in the string to be one field later. It said it's needed for cpuid, while it should be for bn. - Also add linux_ppc32.o to the debian-powerpc

Bug#335486: openssl: FTBFS (ppc64): gcc: '-b' must come at the start of the command line

2005-10-24 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: openssl Version: 0.9.8a-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'openssl' on ppc64/unstable, I get the following error: gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -bpowerpc64-linux -DB_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -g -Wall -c

Bug#335486: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#335486: openssl: FTBFS (ppc64): gcc: '-b' must come at the start of the command line

2005-10-24 Thread Andreas Jochens
Hello Kurt, thanks for your quick reply to my report. On 05-Oct-24 19:44, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Why does it fail? What error message does it give? I think you should look at getting that compiled instead of just removing it. The build fails with the following error: gcc -I. -I.. -I../include

Bug#335486: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#335486: openssl: FTBFS (ppc64): gcc: '-b' must come at the start of the command line

2005-10-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:00:23AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Additionally, the patch removes 'linux_ppc64.o' from the 'debian-ppc64' target because it causes the compilation to fail. Why does it fail? What error message does it give? I think you should look at getting that compiled