Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: - ls -l /etc/alternatives | grep vi lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2005-06-13 23:55 gvim.1.gz - /usr/share/man/man1/vim.1.gz Uhm ... that's mine: the old gvim diversion need to be removed in some preinst. Could you please

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
tags 335502 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Eduard Bloch wrote: after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks in /usr/bin to the alternatives links were just missing. I think it comes from some internal breakage in update-alternatives, I have seen it doing strange

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Info that could help can be: BTW, about your mention of /usr/bin/gvim in the bug reposrt subject: are you really missing /usr/bin/gvim? That would be really strange since it is not created with update-alternatives, but is a symlink part of the vim package ... -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*-

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 11:08:31AM]: Info that could help can be: BTW, about your mention of /usr/bin/gvim in the bug reposrt subject: are you really missing /usr/bin/gvim? That would be really strange since it is not created with update-alternatives, but

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
reassign 335502 dpkg thanks #include hallo.h * Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 10:44:54AM]: tags 335502 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Eduard Bloch wrote: after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks in /usr/bin to the alternatives links were just

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Sorry, was wrong statement. gvim-vim symlink was there, it was just not displayed by which (obviosly) in the quick test. Ok, one problem is solved then :-) What about the other information I asked in the previous post? -- Stefano

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
[ Of course I asked this information again just a ms before receiving your mail, sorry for that ] On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:36:13PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: reassign 335502 dpkg thanks I don't think it worked, you did not Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe because you did that manually with

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 12:47:20PM]: [ Of course I asked this information again just a ms before receiving your mail, sorry for that ] On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:36:13PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: reassign 335502 dpkg thanks I don't think it worked,

Bug#335502: /usr/bin/{vim,gvim} symlinks not created

2005-10-24 Thread Eduard Bloch
Package: vim-common Version: 1:6.4-001+2 Severity: normal Hello, after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks in /usr/bin to the alternatives links were just missing. I think it comes from some internal breakage in update-alternatives, I have seen it doing strange