Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-06-23 John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Westby wrote: [...] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.7), libgnutls11-dev, libnss3-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config,

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread John Belmonte
Andreas Metzler wrote: However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one, there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing DLP but gnutls. I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the -dev package? It may make your transitions appear

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-06-24 John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Metzler wrote: However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one, there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing DLP but gnutls. I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-23 Thread John Belmonte
James Westby wrote: tags 335771 patch thanks Hi, I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however. James ... -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev,

Bug#335771: Please use gnutls13 instead of gnutls11

2006-06-22 Thread James Westby
tags 335771 patch thanks Hi, I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however. James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ diff -u xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control