On 2006-06-23 John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Westby wrote:
[...]
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config,
libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.7), libgnutls11-dev,
libnss3-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config,
Andreas Metzler wrote:
However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one,
there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing
DLP but gnutls.
I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the -dev package?
It may make your transitions appear
On 2006-06-24 John Belmonte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Metzler wrote:
However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one,
there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing
DLP but gnutls.
I see. So why has gnutls removed the sonumber from the
James Westby wrote:
tags 335771 patch
thanks
Hi,
I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to
build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however.
James
...
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, libxml2-dev,
libxslt1-dev,
tags 335771 patch
thanks
Hi,
I rebuilt xmlsec1 with the attatched (trivial) patch and it seemed to
build fine. I didn't test the resulting package however.
James
--
James Westby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jameswestby.net/
diff -u xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control xmlsec1-1.2.9/debian/control
5 matches
Mail list logo