Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev

2005-11-03 Thread Philipp Kolmann
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 01:36:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Oct 26, Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will never happen, because the script expects / to be writeable. Then a separate bug should be opened regarding this, right? No, because it's a feature. So how can I instruct

Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev

2005-11-03 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 03, Philipp Kolmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how can I instruct the kernel which modules should get loaded first? You don't. If you want to load modules in a specific order then you blacklist them (man 5 modprobe.conf) to prevent udev to load them and then add them to /etc/modules. If

Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev

2005-10-26 Thread Tino Keitel
Package: module-init-tools Version: 3.2-pre9-3 Severity: normal Hi, in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/10/msg00380.html, you mentioned a change of the run priority of the module-init-tools initscript to S03 to be able to specify an order for modules which should be loaded at boot time.

Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev

2005-10-26 Thread Tino Keitel
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:56:44 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Oct 26, Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/10/msg00380.html, you mentioned a change of the run priority of the module-init-tools initscript to S03 to be able to specify an order

Bug#335861: module-init-tools initscript should be started befor udev

2005-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It will never happen, because the script expects / to be writeable. Then a separate bug should be opened regarding this, right? No, because it's a feature. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature