Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2006-01-08 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-08 23:44]: > We already have got one approval, but after this we made a slight change > and asked you for a new approval of an NMU. Unfortunately we didn't get > any response, so I ask again. Please see the following email: > > On Mon, 12 Dez 2005, p

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2006-01-08 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear Rafael! We already have got one approval, but after this we made a slight change and asked you for a new approval of an NMU. Unfortunately we didn't get any response, so I ask again. Please see the following email: On Mon, 12 Dez 2005, preining wrote: > Dear Rafael! > > On Don, 08 Dez 2005

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-12 Thread Norbert Preining
Dear Rafael! On Don, 08 Dez 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > Thanks for your bug report on tipa. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to > invest time on checking your patch or doing any change to the package. > Please, feel free to NMU. I have remade a new package tipa_1.2-2.1 with only a slig

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-09 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I changed it to UTF8 as I entered your name into it. But this shouldn't > be the problem. It seems that is a dpkg-buildpackage problem: I got the > original package (apt-get source tipa) an built it in pbuilder, and I > also got tipa_1.2-2_all.deb. So

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-09 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank! On Fre, 09 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > Two things: I built the binary deb in a pbuilder env, and now in the > > .changes file there is "Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" which is probably > > not the right thing. > > No, it should be > > Maintainer: Original maintainer <[EMAIL PROT

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-09 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank, hi Rafael! > > On Don, 08 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: >> > Maybe Frank you can upload it for me to debian? >> >> I have looked at it, and I have some remarks and a general question. > > The general question is missing. It was in a separat

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-09 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank, hi Rafael! On Don, 08 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > Maybe Frank you can upload it for me to debian? > > I have looked at it, and I have some remarks and a general question. The general question is missing. A new version of the packages are on the tug server incorporating all your

Bug#335990: configuration files in TeX add-on packages (was: Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy)

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe Frank you can upload it for me to debian? > > deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ updpkg/ > deb-src http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ updpkg/ And now the general question: We have now moved all our TeX-input-configuration fi

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-08 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank, hi Rafael! > > On Don, 08 Dez 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> Thanks for your bug report on tipa. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to >> invest time on checking your patch or doing any change to the package. >> Please, feel free to NM

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-08 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Frank, hi Rafael! On Don, 08 Dez 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > Thanks for your bug report on tipa. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to > invest time on checking your patch or doing any change to the package. > Please, feel free to NMU. I have prepared a NMU package 1.2-2.1 with correc

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-07 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
Norbert and Frank, Thanks for your bug report on tipa. Unfortunately, I am currently unable to invest time on checking your patch or doing any change to the package. Please, feel free to NMU. Thanks, -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-06 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> texlive does not have such a hack, therefore you can depend on >> "..|texlive-*" only after the second part. > > True. I forgot on this. > > No problem with me. I have the texlive packages currently only > recommending the respective tipa package, bu

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-06 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi Rafael and Frank! On Mon, 05 Dez 2005, Frank Küster wrote: > > . new location of map file > > this is a two step process to move the map file from /etc/texmf/map/.. > > FIRST to /etc/texmf/fonts/map/dvips, and after tetex has moved all > > the maps to /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map (and thus

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-05 Thread Frank Küster
Hi Rafael, hi Norbert, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is an interdiff between an updated version and the current > version Debian, but I include it here with some comments. This bug should be fixed in two steps: > Only two things have changed: > . use dh_installtexfonts

Bug#335990: patch for making tipa conforming to current TeX policy

2005-12-03 Thread Norbert Preining
Package: tipa Version: 1.2-2 Followup-For: Bug #335990 Hi Rafael! In the course of checking how to get all TeX packages to work nicely with tetex3 and texlive, I took the tipa package and fixed some things. Attached is an interdiff between an updated version and the current version Debian, but I