Bug#336244: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#336244: uncomplete udma list with hdparm -tTi]

2005-10-29 Thread Andre Bischof
Hello, Mark Lord wrote: All I can offer on this, is that -i is *100%* dependent upon whatever the IDE driver in the kernel decides to tell us. Whereas -I (uppercase) is what the drive itself tells hdparm. in the meantime, I detected -I as well, which seems to work as it is expected:

Bug#336244: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#336244: uncomplete udma list with hdparm -tTi]

2005-10-28 Thread Stephen Gran
tags 336244 upstream forwarded 336244 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Mark, When you get a minute, can you take a look at this? I just have no idea why this would be happening. Or, rather, I have no idea why the test performed should return true in one case and false in another. Thanksm --

Bug#336244: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#336244: uncomplete udma list with hdparm -tTi]

2005-10-28 Thread Mark Lord
: uncomplete udma list with hdparm -tTi From: Frisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:26:50 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: hdparm Version: 6.1-2 Severity: normal hdparm -tTi shows an uncomplete udma list