On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:59 +0100, Peter Teichmann wrote:
I am not sure if I am just not able to see it, but it seems to me that parts
of the framebuffer driver are not especially clearly coded...
I'm not sure what you mean here, but it's certainly true that the fbdev
driver has grown a lot
Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2005 10:03 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
I'm not sure what you mean here, but it's certainly true that the fbdev
driver has grown a lot of warts over the years. Are you volunteering for
a rewrite? :)
Not now, maybe later when I have time to dig a bit more into it. It would
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Teichmann wrote:
The framebuffer driver does not set the display width properly if used
without Shadow, but keeps the old value from the probed built-in mode.
If the horizontal resolution of the later selected video mode differs,
this is a problem.
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2005 13:14 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Teichmann wrote:
diff -urd xc.orig/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/fbdev/fbdev.c
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/fbdev/fbdev.c ---
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The framebuffer driver does not set the display width properly if used
without Shadow, but keeps the old value from the probed built-in mode.
If the horizontal resolution of the later selected video mode differs,
this
5 matches
Mail list logo