Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-11 Thread KELEMEN Peter
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060310 22:07]: Only when the library ABI changes again. I fail to see how it is useful. New packages that are introduced to the archive after the ABI change don't have any suffix, so it is impossible to tell just by looking at the package name what ABI

Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 12:57:10PM +0100, KELEMEN Peter wrote: * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060310 22:07]: Only when the library ABI changes again. I fail to see how it is useful. New packages that are introduced to the archive after the ABI change don't have any suffix, so it

Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-10 Thread KELEMEN Peter
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060308 00:22]: [...] so I'm downgrading and untagging the bug. So when are we supposed to drop the c2a suffix? Peter -- .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'''+. .+'' Kelemen Péter / \ / \ /

Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:26:30PM +0100, KELEMEN Peter wrote: * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20060308 00:22]: [...] so I'm downgrading and untagging the bug. So when are we supposed to drop the c2a suffix? Only when the library ABI changes again. -- Steve Langasek

Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-08 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 339163 -fixed severity 339163 important thanks On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:06:27PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: from what I see in 339163, Steve renamed the package for the C++ transition. Is there a special reason for that to not be reflected in the subsequent maintainer uploads? The

Bug#339163: State of 339163 (C++ transition NMU seems to have been partially reverted)

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Peter, Steve, from what I see in 339163, Steve renamed the package for the C++ transition. Is there a special reason for that to not be reflected in the subsequent maintainer uploads? The bug isn't acknowledged in BTS because the 0.7-10 was never uploaded but I'm doubtful about the fix. Kind