On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 12:28:11AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Vorlon's email seems to have received an instantaneous response from
you, where my email on November 2 is unanswered after more than two
weeks. Is this normal procedure, or did something unusual happen in
this case?
He was
#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign
On 10477 March 1977, Thomas Bushnell wrote:
- Your package was held back since it was requested to ease a move of
whatever packages to testing. I cant see right now a unblock request in
my mail folders (but that may be because Im @work, so may be unable to
Hi
Steve asked for a little comment here, so here it goes:
- Your package was held back since it was requested to ease a move of
whatever packages to testing. I cant see right now a unblock request in
my mail folders (but that may be because Im @work, so may be unable to
find it, limited access
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Your package was held back since it was requested to ease a move of
whatever packages to testing. I cant see right now a unblock request in
my mail folders (but that may be because Im @work, so may be unable to
find it, limited access to my mailbox
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either
g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:35:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not? AFAIK, there's no reason that you can't do an additional upload
that would let both new binary package names through the NEW queue at the
same time.
Because it won't get through any faster that way. It will simply get
added to the existing
Compiler versions g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 and g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 are now in the
archive. The renaming of the library packages can now start. You can
upload the packages even before the toolchain is built for all architectures
because the packages with the new binary packages will be hold in the NEW
queue
Package: libofx
Severity: important
Please do not take any action before reading
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html
This bug report is filed against the source package which builds
a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing
*mt_alloc* symbols.
9 matches
Mail list logo
