Bug#339685: glib2.0: Not binNMU-able using + notation.

2005-11-19 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:49:49AM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: On ven, 2005-11-18 at 00:54 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: allow the old scheme anymore. For some reason we ended up with libglib2.0-0 depending on libglib2.0-udeb Please debug this so we can know that next upload will not do

Bug#339685: glib2.0: Not binNMU-able using + notation.

2005-11-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
On ven, 2005-11-18 at 00:54 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: allow the old scheme anymore. For some reason we ended up with libglib2.0-0 depending on libglib2.0-udeb Please debug this so we can know that next upload will not do the same. Maybe I can get the archive to accept the -1.0.1 again, but

Bug#339685: glib2.0: Not binNMU-able using + notation.

2005-11-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: glib2.0 Severity: important Hi, You have the following in your debian/rules file: version=$(shell echo ${debversion} | sed -e 's/-[A-Za-z0-9\.]*$$//g' -e 's/+[A-Za-z0-9\.]*$$//g') And then use that version for a few things (like replacing debian/*.in). This is causing a build failure

Bug#339685: glib2.0: Not binNMU-able using + notation.

2005-11-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, It would be nice if you could do an upload soon, since we're currently unable to do a binNMU on amd64 because dak doesn't allow the old scheme anymore. For some reason we ended up with libglib2.0-0 depending on libglib2.0-udeb, and can't upload a fixed version to the archive. Maybe I can