Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.14
Version: 2.6.14-4
Severity: minor
Hello,
I've just compiled a new kernel from
linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.deb,
and I noticed this includes the official patches 2.6.14.1 up to
2.6.14.3, except from the extraversion. So, by default the new kernel
will
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:04:12PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> Package: linux-patch-debian-2.6.14
> Version: 2.6.14-4
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just compiled a new kernel from
> linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.deb,
> and I noticed this includes the official patches 2.6.1
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Linux version 2.6.14-2-powerpc (Debian 2.6.14-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
> version 4.0.3 20051023 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-3.sven.1)) #2 Thu Nov 10
> 11:55:12 UTC 2005
>
> This is mine, for example, and you see that it is 2.6.14-2-p
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Linux version 2.6.14-2-powerpc (Debian 2.6.14-3) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
> > version 4.0.3 20051023 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-3.sven.1)) #2 Thu Nov 10
> > 11:55:12
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:09:41PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The suggestion was also to avoid name clashes, i.e.
> > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14
> > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-3_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14.2
> > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-4_all.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:00:24PM +0100, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:09:41PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The suggestion was also to avoid name clashes, i.e.
> > > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-2_all.deb -> applied on 2.6.14
> > > linux-patch-debian-2.6.14_2.6.14-3_
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 2) I got a number of crashes (total freeze) with such kernel. The
> >personnal best is less than 5 minutes :-{. A 2.6.14.3 pristine
> >(linux patches - no debian patches) does not exhibit this
> >behaviour, AFAIK (currentl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pascal!
In preparation of the upcoming etch release, would you please
test if either 2.6.17-9 from testing or 2.6.18-3 from unstable
fixes your problem with the ACPI THRM zone?
If you want to change behaviour of make-kpkg please write up a summar
8 matches
Mail list logo