Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by it). Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-07 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by it). Steve,

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-02 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if fldw -10(,sp),fr23 is a valid instruction or not. Aurelien, gdb may not be decoding the instruction correctly. Shouldn't the target of word load

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-28 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:04:44AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Rather than debugging this by remote control, you might find it easier to simply run uic yourself. Obtain the sources for cppunit (e.g. by apt-get source cppunit) then do: cd src/qttestrunner /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-27 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Dear Grant, On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:27:59AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: Can you provide more context around the offending insn? 10 lines of asm before and after the SIGILL instruction? And possibly a register dump just before the SIGILL is issued? It would be interesting to know what %SP

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-24 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... and now the problem is a SIGILL that occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from libgcc_s.so.2. ... It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if fldw -10(,sp),fr23 is a

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 thanks On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.) But