Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
#341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
it).
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
#341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
it).
Steve,
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if
fldw -10(,sp),fr23
is a valid instruction or not.
Aurelien,
gdb may not be decoding the instruction correctly.
Shouldn't the target of word load
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:04:44AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Rather than debugging this by remote control, you might find it
easier to simply run uic yourself. Obtain the sources for
cppunit (e.g. by apt-get source cppunit) then do:
cd src/qttestrunner
/usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
Dear Grant,
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:27:59AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
Can you provide more context around the offending insn?
10 lines of asm before and after the SIGILL instruction?
And possibly a register dump just before the SIGILL is issued?
It would be interesting to know what %SP
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
...
and now the problem is a SIGILL that
occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from
libgcc_s.so.2.
...
It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if
fldw -10(,sp),fr23
is a
reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5
thanks
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug
#326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug
#326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really
was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.)
But
8 matches
Mail list logo