unblock 360739 by 342248
thanks
Hello,
It is fixed AFAIK. Squashfs FTBFS but not for the same reason. Thanks
for your work. If Max agrees, it is maybe the time to close this bug,
right ?
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:39:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Are you sure you are using the per-flavour header packages
> (linux-headers-2.6.14-2- ?
The package build-depends on linux-headers-2.6.14-2-all and
uses the per-flavour headers for the actual build.
> Also, do you know about the exte
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:09:47PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:12:05AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > > Apparently the binaries in m68k -headers were built for i386.
> >
> > Yes,
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:12:05AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > Apparently the binaries in m68k -headers were built for i386.
>
> Yes, this may very well be possible, since the m68k linux-* packages
> were cro
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.12-10
> Severity: important
>
> This bug is a bit weird :-)
>
> Apparently the binaries in m68k -headers were built for i386.
Yes, this may very well be possible, since the m68k linux-* packages
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: important
This bug is a bit weird :-)
Apparently the binaries in m68k -headers were built for i386.
This breaks builds of external modules as they try to execute eg.
scripts/basic/fixdep on m68k.
$ dpkg -x linux-headers-2.6.12-1-amiga_2.6.12-10_m
6 matches
Mail list logo
