On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:41:47AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.
Actually it *is* the business of Debian maintainers to determine what
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:41:47AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.
Actually it *is* the
* Stephan Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Anand Kumria wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:41:47AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
it's not their business to editorialize
Hi Stephen!
Stephen Frost [2005-12-13 11:06 -0500]:
Honestly, in the end I think the default should be changed. It could
fall-back to double with a warning (if it doesn't already) if the
compiler doesn't support 64bit integers.
[...]
I don't think the Debian default should be changed
Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I fully agree. (BTW, I doubt that double operations on m68k would be
any faster than integer ones...)
Debatable at best --- most later 68k machines had hardware FPUs, but
none of them had any 64-bit-int instructions...
regards, tom
Tom Lane wrote:
You've got that 100% backwards: you should be complaining to Debian that
it's not their business to editorialize on the default setting.
I've forwarded this thread to Debian as a bug report. Their answer is
they will discuss this setting again when 8.2 comes out. The full answer
6 matches
Mail list logo
