On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Sjoerd Hemminga wrote:
The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :)
In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function
LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before
fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf,
The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :)
In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function
LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before
fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf, NULL);
This line is added by your patch.
However in the upstream source fp
El viernes, 9 de diciembre de 2005 15:41, Sjoerd Hemminga escribió:
The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :)
In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function
LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before
fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf,
Hi David,
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, David [iso-8859-1] Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
Hello, Sjoerd. Nice analysis...thank you very much.
You're welcome.
You do not tell in your mail if you tried to build Xorg with this
change. I would like to try a build (maybe tonight) before merging your
4 matches
Mail list logo