Bug#342659: Found the problem

2005-12-15 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Sjoerd Hemminga wrote: The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :) In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf,

Bug#342659: Found the problem

2005-12-09 Thread Sjoerd Hemminga
The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :) In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf, NULL); This line is added by your patch. However in the upstream source fp

Bug#342659: Found the problem

2005-12-09 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El viernes, 9 de diciembre de 2005 15:41, Sjoerd Hemminga escribió: The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :) In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf,

Bug#342659: Found the problem

2005-12-09 Thread s . hemminga
Hi David, On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, David [iso-8859-1] Mart?nez Moreno wrote: Hello, Sjoerd. Nice analysis...thank you very much. You're welcome. You do not tell in your mail if you tried to build Xorg with this change. I would like to try a build (maybe tonight) before merging your