On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 04:09:54AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-04 18:34]:
> > package that I requested removal for, and I remembered wrongly that it
> > was libsndfile0.
> >
> > I will try to get xmovie either updated or removed (it looks like it
> >
* H. S. Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-04 18:34]:
> package that I requested removal for, and I remembered wrongly that it
> was libsndfile0.
>
> I will try to get xmovie either updated or removed (it looks like it
> hasn't been touched for a LONG time).
What's the status of this?
--
Martin M
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:43:25PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > Please don't use libsndfile0 anymore. It has been obsoleted upstream a
> > long time ago, and has been replaced by libsndfile1 (maintained by a
> > different DD). I have already submitted a request to remove libsndfile0
> >
Hi.
> Please don't use libsndfile0 anymore. It has been obsoleted upstream a
> long time ago, and has been replaced by libsndfile1 (maintained by a
> different DD). I have already submitted a request to remove libsndfile0
> from the Debian archive. Thanks!
Please, could you check, whether such re
tags 342682 + wontfix
thanks
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:16:43PM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Package: libsndfile0
> Version: 0.0.28-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> the current version of libsndfile0 fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD,
> because of outdated libtool.
Hi,
Please don't use libsn
5 matches
Mail list logo
