On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
- Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, they
should at least be informed so that they can make a choice between
dropping
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:03:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Two questions:
- Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, they
On Wed, Jan 4, 2006 at 00:54:38 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Please do, porters should at least be informed, and get a chance to
comment, and to fix the issue at hand.
Agreed, and mailed debian-hppa:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2006/01/msg7.html
I don't think these
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
Two questions:
- Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, they
should at least be informed so that they can make a choice between
tags 342704 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:48:00PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi ftpmasters,
the ocaml native compilers on hppa don't build anymore, and upstream
said:
This is due to architectural limitations of HPPA. Too hard to fix
without control of the linker,
and the
reassign 342704 ftp.debian.org
severity 342704 important
retitle 342704 RM: ocaml:ocaml-native-compilers [hppa] -- RoM; ANAIS;
unsupported upstream
kthxbye
Hi ftpmasters,
the ocaml native compilers on hppa don't build anymore, and upstream
said:
This is due to architectural limitations of HPPA.
6 matches
Mail list logo
