On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I was trying to write one that did all in util-linux, but during that time
it become apparent that the fix needs to involve glibc and initscripts too
to be effective during DST.
The patch was too simplistic to be of
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I was trying to write one that did all in util-linux, but during that time
it become apparent that the fix needs to involve glibc and initscripts too
to be effective during
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:29:02AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:50:24PM +0100, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I was trying to write one that did all in util-linux, but during that time
it become apparent
tag 343645 wontfix
thanks
Please, no screwing with this glibc and util-linux issue.
It should be fixed by util-linux (patch 50% done by yours thruly), and
glibc. It is wontfix for initscripts. It is almost-pending for util-linux.
I have no idea if, after util-linux is fixed, glibc will do the
Hi LaMont!
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 08:55:26AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
It should be fixed by util-linux (patch 50% done by yours thruly), and
glibc. It is wontfix for initscripts. It is almost-pending for util-linux.
I have no
5 matches
Mail list logo
