On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 01:52 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:40:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >> >Package: cdrecord
> >> >Version: 4:2.01+01a03
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:40:40PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>> >Package: cdrecord
>> >Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4
>> >Severity: important
>> >
>> >A backtrace is below[1]. The 4
On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 12:48 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> >Package: cdrecord
> >Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4
> >Severity: important
> >
> >A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but
> >reported
> >an error[2].
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 05:40:09PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
>Package: cdrecord
>Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4
>Severity: important
>
>A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but reported
>an error[2].
Bugger. I _think_ I've found the problem, some debug left in that was
a lit
Package: cdrecord
Version: 4:2.01+01a03-4
Severity: important
A backtrace is below[1]. The 4:2.01+01a03-4 release didn't segv, but reported
an error[2].
[1]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ sudo gdb /usr/bin/cdrecord.mmap
GNU gdb 6.3.90_20051119-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is
5 matches
Mail list logo