tags 343705 - moreinfo
tags 343705 + pending
thanks
Romain Francoise wrote:
Now that your patch has been applied upstream, do you consider this bug
closed? You still lose the backup file, but `buffer-backed-up' is now
correctly reset to nil.
Actually, losing the old backup is unavoidable bec
Now that your patch has been applied upstream, do you consider this bug
closed? You still lose the backup file, but `buffer-backed-up' is now
correctly reset to nil.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
`-
--
To
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You did not accidentally try this in a temporary directory where Emacs
> does not make backups at all, as the manual states in section 23.3.2?
Why, yes, yes indeed I did. :-)
I can definitely reproduce this now.
--
,''`.
: :' :Romain Franc
Romain Francoise wrote:
Nope, and starting Emacs with -Q disables all customizations.
I know, I just wanted to make sure that you really started with -Q. :-)
Which filesystem are you using? Is it a regular filesystem, or a remote
NFS mount (or something similar)?
A normal local file syste
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I have installed your binaries, am running
> GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars)
> of 2005-12-15 on pacem, modified by Debian
> and can still see the problem.
Rats.
> I am really puzzled that this did not happen t
Romain Francoise wrote:
For the record, why do you rebuild each snapshot? Not using unstable?
In the first weeks, that was one of the reasons as I was still running
sarge then; but not anymore. Now it has other reasons: following links in
*Help* buffers for built-in functions and variables (
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's my own installation only insofar as I habitually built from
> source (I did this with every weekly snapshot in the last four
> months), but I didn't change anything.
For the record, why do you rebuild each snapshot? Not using unstable?
> I noticed
Romain Francoise wrote:
Hm... it doesn't happen here. After hitting C-g, the backup file is
still there, and `buffer-backed-up' is still nil in the `bar' buffer.
That's how it ought to be, yes. And if you cannot reproduce the
problem, that explains why upstream didn't bother (and probably fi
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Take the following steps to reproduce the problem:
> $ export LC_ALL=C
> $ echo "foo" > bar ; cp bar bar~
> $ emacs -Q -f view-hello-file bar
> In Emacs, in the "bar" buffer, type
> M-x insert-buffer RET
> C-x C-s
> Emacs should display a '*Warning*'
Package: emacs-snapshot
Version: 1:20051215-1
Severity: normal
[ I had already reported this bug upstream four weeks ago, but got no
response. And since it has not been fixed either, nobody seems to feel
responsible. So I report it here, trying to draw attention to the
problem. ]
If saving a b
10 matches
Mail list logo
