Bug#344253: should not be standard priority, I think

2005-12-21 Thread Joey Hess
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > libc6-i686 (like libc6-sparcv9) is something quite different - it's an > optimization package, it doesn't enable any new functionality. What new functionality does libc6-amd64 provide to a non-amd system? FWIW, adding 7 mb to standard without consulting anyone has a ten

Bug#344253: should not be standard priority, I think

2005-12-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:18:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Package: libc6-amd64 > Severity: normal > > This package is currently of standard priority, which means that it will > be installed, by default, on every debian install. I think that's wrong. > Other packages such as libc6-686 are priori

Bug#344253: should not be standard priority, I think

2005-12-21 Thread Joey Hess
Package: libc6-amd64 Severity: normal This package is currently of standard priority, which means that it will be installed, by default, on every debian install. I think that's wrong. Other packages such as libc6-686 are priority extra. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable AP