Bug#344371: Fwd: Re: Bug#344371: Installation report initramfs failure

2005-12-23 Thread Geert Stappers
> > Backward compatibility is a bitch, ain't it? > > Seriously, then the possibility to choose sarge/stable as a > installation target should not be available too... Disabling stupid things means also disabling smart things. Or simpeler: A knive has the be sharp GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Bug#344371: Fwd: Re: Bug#344371: Installation report initramfs failure

2005-12-22 Thread Frans Pop
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#344371: Installation report initramfs failure Date: Thursday 22 December 2005 16:44 From: John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:06:30 +0100 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#344371: Installation report initramfs failure

2005-12-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:08, John Smith wrote: > Comments/Problems: > After choosing the kernel, the installation failed with the message > that it was unable to install initramfs with the following syslog part This is because you are using an image intended to install Etch or unstable to

Bug#344371: Installation report initramfs failure

2005-12-21 Thread John Smith
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2005-12-22/netboot/netboot.tar.gz uname -a: 2.6.14-2 Date: 2005-12-22 Method: pxe netboot mode expert Machine: IMB Thinkcentre Processor: 686 2.8GHz Memory: 1GB RAM Root Device: /de