Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2006-01-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > libgd2 fails to build on hurd-i386 due to this error: > > > > > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > > > build-libgd2-noxpm/.libs/libgd.so.2.0.33 > > > --> libc0.3-dev package exists. > > > --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. > > > --> libjpeg62-dev package exists. >

Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2006-01-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > libgd2 fails to build on hurd-i386 due to this error: > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > build-libgd2-noxpm/.libs/libgd.so.2.0.33 > --> libc0.3-dev package exists. > --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. > --> libjpeg62-dev package exists. > --> libpng12-0-dev is

Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2006-01-08 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:47:11AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > libgd2 fails to build on hurd-i386 due to this error: > > > > d-devlibdeps debian/libgd2-noxpm-dev.substvars > > build-libgd2-noxpm/.libs/libgd.so.2.0.33 > > --> libc0.3-dev package exists. > > --> libfreetype6-dev pack

Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2005-12-24 Thread Michael Banck
Package: d-shlibs Version: 0.27 Severity: important Hi, libgd2 fails to build on hurd-i386 due to this error: d-devlibdeps debian/libgd2-noxpm-dev.substvars build-libgd2-noxpm/.libs/libgd.so.2.0.33 --> libc0.3-dev package exists. --> libfreetype6-dev package exists. --> libjpeg62-dev

Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2006-06-19 Thread Michael Banck
Blah, forgot about that. On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:41:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Can you verify that the following will fix ? > > diff -ru d-shlibs-0.27-orig/d-devlibdeps d-shlibs-0.27/d-devlibdeps > --- d-shlibs-0.27-orig/d-devlibdeps 2005-08-30 08:33:56.0 +0900 > +++ d-shlib

Bug#344713: d-shlibs: Does not handle libpthread on hurd-i386

2006-06-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:45:54PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Yeah, it works great, thanks. Hi, I just wanted to confirm that this patch fixes the problem on my side too. Thanks. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: Digital signature