> Ok, fix is in my tree and will be in the next release. Do you mind
> reporting this upstream? (bugzilla.mozilla.org)
Just reported it, mozilla bug number is 322806.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Antti P Miettinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Seems that the inputs for the inline asm in XPTC_InvokeByIndex() in
> > > xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp need an
> > > additional memory input in order to prevent gcc from optimizing away
> > > the initialization of the stru
> > Seems that the inputs for the inline asm in XPTC_InvokeByIndex() in
> > xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp need an
> > additional memory input in order to prevent gcc from optimizing away
> > the initialization of the structure used by the asm.
>
> Is this a gcc 4 issue? Any
* Antti P Miettinen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
> Severity: normal
>
> While testing the ARM system emulation in QEMU I noticed that firefox
> segfaults without the below change.
>
> Seems that the inputs for the inline asm in XPTC_InvokeByIndex() in
> xpco
Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-3
Severity: normal
While testing the ARM system emulation in QEMU I noticed that firefox
segfaults without the below change.
Seems that the inputs for the inline asm in XPTC_InvokeByIndex() in
xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix/xptcinvoke_arm.cpp need an
addition
5 matches
Mail list logo
