On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:13:35AM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
I can't help in coding the necessary changes (as I can't code) ... But
why not reassign 345035 to the package being responsible for the
issue? To dpkg - see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=244658
- Or texinfo? Wh
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:52:32AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: coreutils
> > Version: 5.94-1
> > Followup-For: Bug #345035
> >
> > ... also: to get 'info dd' one has to 'info coreutils dd', otherwise
> > 'info ddd' is presented.
>
> FYI, i
Wolfgang Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: coreutils
> Version: 5.94-1
> Followup-For: Bug #345035
>
> ... also: to get 'info dd' one has to 'info coreutils dd', otherwise
> 'info ddd' is presented.
FYI, in general, even
info coreutils
is insufficient.
For example, `info coreutils
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 11:34:19PM +0100, you wrote:
... also: to get 'info dd' one has to 'info coreutils dd', otherwise
'info ddd' is presented.
Yes, I know. Read the logs associated with the bugs. It isn't necessary
to add any more "me toos".
--
Michael Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.94-1
Followup-For: Bug #345035
... also: to get 'info dd' one has to 'info coreutils dd', otherwise
'info ddd' is presented.
Thanks
Best Regards
Wolfgang Pfeiffer
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'u
5 matches
Mail list logo