Bug#345639: marked as done (nl_langinfo(YESEXPR) ignores LANGUAGE, no apparent workaround)

2006-02-12 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:18:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > There is no bug, LANGUAGE is only used to determine which message > catalog is displayed. Bug submitter should instead set LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 > and LC_* variables to en_GB.UTF-8 if needed. Claudio, can you verify this? D

Bug#345639: marked as done (nl_langinfo(YESEXPR) ignores LANGUAGE, no apparent workaround)

2006-02-12 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:28:58PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:18:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > There is no bug, LANGUAGE is only used to determine which message > > catalog is displayed. Bug submitter should instead set LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 > > and LC_* v

Bug#345639: marked as done (nl_langinfo(YESEXPR) ignores LANGUAGE, no apparent workaround)

2006-02-12 Thread Claudio Nieder
Hi, > There is no bug, LANGUAGE is only used to determine which message > catalog is displayed. Bug submitter should instead set LANG=de_CH.UTF-8 > and LC_* variables to en_GB.UTF-8 if needed. Actually it's not that I wanted that but, as I explained, at some point in time I decided to change la

Bug#345639: marked as done (nl_langinfo(YESEXPR) ignores LANGUAGE, no apparent workaround)

2006-02-12 Thread Denis Barbier
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Claudio Nieder wrote: > Having LANG and LANGUAGE set to de_CH and LC_* to en_GB did not work: > > # env | grep -e '^LC' -e '^LANG'; adduser au-test > LC_PAPER=en_GB.UTF-8 > LC_ADDRESS=en_GB.UTF-8 > LC_MONETARY=en_GB.UTF-8 > LC_NUMERIC=en_GB.UTF-8 > LC_ALL=