Bug#347899: amoeba: works only with direct rendering

2006-01-14 Thread A Mennucc
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:40:46PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: 3) if you really decide to not change the behaviour, you should state in the package description that the package will refuse to work when DRI is not available (it is frustrating to download and istall 52Mb of useless

Bug#347899: amoeba: works only with direct rendering

2006-01-13 Thread A Mennucc
Package: amoeba Version: 1.1-16 Severity: normal hi I tried amoeba and the result was $ amoeba ERROR! sizeof(SISDRIRec) does not match passed size from device driver libGL warning: 3D driver returned no fbconfigs. libGL error: InitDriver failed libGL error: reverting to (slow) indirect

Bug#347899: amoeba: works only with direct rendering

2006-01-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
tags 347899 wontfix thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:08:29PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: The last line is a surprise: why does amoeba fail to run? Because you have no way at all of getting proper sync or the required performance with indirect rendering. The software is basically useless, so it's

Bug#347899: amoeba: works only with direct rendering

2006-01-13 Thread A Mennucc
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:28:42PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: tags 347899 wontfix thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:08:29PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: The last line is a surprise: why does amoeba fail to run? Because you have no way at all of getting proper sync or the required

Bug#347899: amoeba: works only with direct rendering

2006-01-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:20:55PM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: PCa: old CPU with crappy video cards with GL DRI PCb: new CPU with no DRI where GL is slower on PCa than PCb (PCa = my notebook, when DRI was working with Xorg 6.8 PCb = my desktop ) But slow != sync. Indirect rendering