On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 22:46 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 21:59 +0100, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > I'm not convinced #348905 is actually resolved.
> > I agree with downgrading it from important to minor or so, since I never
> > was really annoyed by it taking too long to displa
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 21:59 +0100, Erich Schubert wrote:
> I'm not convinced #348905 is actually resolved.
> I agree with downgrading it from important to minor or so, since I never
> was really annoyed by it taking too long to display the password prompt
> anymore. But that might be due to me havi
Hi,
I'm not convinced #348905 is actually resolved.
I agree with downgrading it from important to minor or so, since I never
was really annoyed by it taking too long to display the password prompt
anymore. But that might be due to me having a much faster machine by
now...
xscreensaver was really s
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 19:52 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
--snip--
> > > * Can you try version 2.16 of gnome-screensaver from the
> > > experimental archive?
> >
> > No, unfortunately. I just did a test-run of the upgrade, and it wants to
> > remove beagle (among other things) which
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:41 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> Incidentally, is there any way to disable this option within the UI? I
> found the gconf key for it, but this seems like something that you
> should be able to switch from within the gnome-screensaver preferences
> dialog. (Unless I just m
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:41 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 21:21 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> --snip--
> > * What happens if you turn of fast user switching?
>
> I just turned it off. I'll have to give it a little while to see if it
> has any effect since the slow
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:28 -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> Upstream has marked this bug as resolved but invalid, so I believe that
> it hasn't actually been fixed. What should my next step be for having
> upstream address this? Should I file a separate upstream bug report or
> do we have an automa
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 21:21 +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
--snip--
> * What happens if you turn of fast user switching?
I just turned it off. I'll have to give it a little while to see if it
has any effect since the slow unlock behavior only seems to happen when
the screensaver has been act
Upstream has marked this bug as resolved but invalid, so I believe that
it hasn't actually been fixed. What should my next step be for having
upstream address this? Should I file a separate upstream bug report or
do we have an automated process in place for submitting Debian bugs
upstream?
--
Ale
9 matches
Mail list logo
