On Friday 10 February 2006 06.14, Eitan Gurari wrote:
_
_Sorry, my mistake. Hopefully the just uploaded modified version
_will do the job. -eitan
The dcument types are correct in the current version. Great! Thank you!
I wonder why the xml declaration ?xml ... ? is omitted with option 'frames'
_ I don't like the idea of forced .html extension.
_
_OK. I removed this enforcement. -eitan
Thank you.
I am not convinced this bug is fixed.
I have unpacked the *.4ht files from directory texmf/tex/generic/tex4ht of the
archive http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html into
_Fixed.
Thank you.
_However, I forced the mathml files to have .html extension names since
_my Firefox Mozilla doesn't like the .xml extension names for files in
_frames.
I don't like the idea of forced .html extension.
Please provide more specific information (e.g. sample .xml files)
of the
_However, I forced the mathml files to have .html extension names since
_my Firefox Mozilla doesn't like the .xml extension names for files in
_frames.
I don't like the idea of forced .html extension.
OK. I removed this enforcement. -eitan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Fixed.
However, I forced the mathml files to have .html extension names since
my Firefox Mozilla doesn't like the .xml extension names for files in
frames.
-eitan
1) Command line: mk4ht xhmlatex test.tex xhtml,frames
Document types of output files:
test.html: XHTML 1.0
Package: tex4ht
Version: 20051223-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
This is a long report. A short table of contents:
1 Tests showing the problem
2 Proposal for fix
2.1 Suggested patch
2.2 Tests that the patch passes
2.3 Explanation of patch
* 1 Tests
6 matches
Mail list logo
