Bug#350851: kmail: More mail loss :(

2006-12-29 Thread Ana Guerrero
tags 350851 +fixed-upstream notfound 350851 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-4 close 350851 4:3.5.5-1 thanks On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 07:06:16PM -0600, Adam Porter wrote: [...] I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but KMail still has this problem. (Or maybe this is actually a separate bug caused by a separate

Bug#350851: kmail: More mail loss :(

2006-12-29 Thread Adam Porter
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:37, Ana Guerrero wrote: tags 350851 +fixed-upstream notfound 350851 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-4 close 350851 4:3.5.5-1 thanks On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 07:06:16PM -0600, Adam Porter wrote: [...] I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but KMail still has this problem.

Bug#350851: kmail: More mail loss :(

2006-12-29 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hi Adam, 2006 m. gruodis 29 d., penktadienis 13:43, Adam Porter rašė: And how will opening a new bug report do any good? People who have an interest in this problem are already subscribed to these bug reports. Opening a new one will just make it that much less likely for them to find out

Bug#350851: kmail: More mail loss :(

2006-12-28 Thread Adam Porter
tags 350851 -fixed-upstream reopen 350851 found 350851 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-4 thanks (Actually I can't seem to reopen this bug in KDE. Argh. If someone doesn't notice and reopen it, I'll file a new one and link it to Debian.) It's with a heavy heart that I reopen this bug on KDE's and Debian's