On 11 Feb 2006, at 11:29, martin f krafft wrote:
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
Conversely, I don't see much point in being this restrictive?
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t:
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.13.0042
+0100]:
> >I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
> >than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
>
> Conversely, I don't see much point in being this restrictive?
For a fact,
On 14 Feb 2006, at 08:58, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2006.02.13.0042 +0100]:
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
Conversely, I don't see much p
3 matches
Mail list logo