On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:10:19AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > found 352629 1:1.19-3
>
> WTF? Could you please at least give some sort of *reasoning* for this
> fucking stupid reopening? Besides "Bah, I don't like it"?
Hello Marc,
this bug
Package: libnet-perl
Version: 1.19-3
Severity: important
I get a conffile prompt dist-upgrading a testing machine; the changes
aren't mine, thus I should't be prompted. Please refer to my other
bugs about this problem, such as #335276.
Included is the diff with which I was presented.
--- /etc/li
found 352629 1:1.19-3
thanks
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:04:06AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:12:46AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:18:26AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > I get a
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 02:10:19AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > found 352629 1:1.19-3
>
> WTF? Could you please at least give some sort of *reasoning* for this
> fucking stupid reopening? Besides "Bah, I don't like it"?
I asked Bill if there
tag 352629 patch
thanks
--- libnet-perl-1.19.orig/debian/libnet-perl.preinst
+++ libnet-perl-1.19/debian/libnet-perl.preinst
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+# preinstall script for libnet-perl
+set -e;
+
+# Used to be written with debconf values
+oldmd5='7b6cfb833c2b14432ecb9e4e140f0c0e'
+
+rm_conff
5 matches
Mail list logo
