reassign 353693 texlive-binaries
found 353693 2009-4
stop
On 20.02.06 Ralf Stubner (ralf.stub...@web.de) wrote:
Hi Ralf,
> $ ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
> libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb7fb2000)
> libkpathsea.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4 (0xb7f9e000)
>
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-13sarge14
Severity: normal
$ ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb7fb2000)
libkpathsea.so.4 => /usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4 (0xb7f9e000)
libpoppler.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.0 (0xb7e8a000)
libcair
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see no reason why pdfetex should be linked against libXrender, libX11,
> libfreetype, libfontconfig (would be intersting, though), and libexpat.
> Or am I missing something?
Yes, you are missing that
id:/home/frank# ldd /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.0.0.0
Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I see no reason why pdfetex should be linked against libXrender, libX11,
>> libfreetype, libfontconfig (would be intersting, though), and libexpat.
>> Or am I missing something?
>
> Yes, you are missing that
>
> id:/home/frank# l
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I see no reason why pdfetex should be linked against libXrender, libX11,
>>> libfreetype, libfontconfig (would be intersting, though), and libexpat.
>>> Or am I missing something?
>>
>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 14:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> I tried to follow the instructions at
> http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-updating.html, but because of
> the unusual setup it doesn't work so easy.
>
> At rsync://tug.org/tetexdevsrc/ there's an updated teTeX tree, and with
> th
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 14:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> I tried to follow the instructions at
>> http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-updating.html, but because of
>> the unusual setup it doesn't work so easy.
>>
>> At rsync://tug.org/tetexdev
On Don, 02 Mär 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> Norbert, can you please run ldd on texlive's pdfetex binary to see
> whether the problem also exists in texlive - I guess yes.
[~] ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb7ee9000)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:49 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> [~] ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xb7ee9000)
> libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7ed5000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7ea
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Don, 02 Mär 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Norbert, can you please run ldd on texlive's pdfetex binary to see
>> whether the problem also exists in texlive - I guess yes.
>
> [~] ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
>
On Don, 02 Mär 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Norbert, can you please run ldd on texlive's pdfetex binary to see
> > whether the problem also exists in texlive - I guess yes.
>
> [~] ldd /usr/bin/pdfetex
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
> libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so
11 matches
Mail list logo
