On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Maybe commenting on what features you feel make a difference on this
package vs. others will help users decide which one to install.
Right you are, I will rewrite the long description and emphasize how
lanmap is
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:11:40PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
Should the similarities between PADS and lanmap prevent the latter
from being packaged for Debian ? I understand they both rely on
Of course not!
passive network monitoring to produce info, but I still don't see that
as an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
* License : GPL
Description : lanmap sits quietly on a
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://parseerror.com/lanmap/
* License : GPL
Description : lanmap sits quietly on a
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 01:04:32AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:22:57PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
* Package name: lanmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Ryan Flynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
5 matches
Mail list logo