Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-03-04 Thread Kel Modderman
Julien Valroff wrote: As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in README.Debian, I think madwifi-source should only recommend module-assistant (and not depend). As an alternative, the package could depend on m-a OR kernel-package. Cheers, Julien This is wrong, and the recent

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-23 Thread Julien Valroff
Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:38 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : > Julien Valroff wrote: [...] > >The first is the the best imo, as it really lets the user free not to > >have m-a installed. > > > Ok, done. Will be like that in next upload. Great! Thanks a lot. Cheers, Julien

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-23 Thread Kel Modderman
Julien Valroff wrote: [...] Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:15 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : 90% of the time i also use kernel-package, not m-a, but that is not the point. I believe m-a lays the best framework for the average user to easily install a module. I totally agree, but I thin

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-23 Thread Kel Modderman
Julien Valroff wrote: Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 07:04 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : Kel Modderman wrote: Julien Valroff wrote: Package: madwifi-source Version: 0.svn20060207 Severity: wishlist As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in README.Debian, I thin

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-23 Thread Julien Valroff
[...] Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 19:15 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : > 90% of the time i also use kernel-package, not m-a, but that is not the > point. I believe m-a lays the best framework for the average user to > easily install a module. I totally agree, but I think the best choice is to let

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-23 Thread Julien Valroff
Le jeudi 23 février 2006 à 07:04 +1000, Kel Modderman a écrit : > Kel Modderman wrote: > > > Julien Valroff wrote: > > > >> Package: madwifi-source > >> Version: 0.svn20060207 > >> Severity: wishlist > >> > >> As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in > >> README.Debian, I think m

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-22 Thread Kel Modderman
Kel Modderman wrote: Julien Valroff wrote: Package: madwifi-source Version: 0.svn20060207 Severity: wishlist As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in README.Debian, I think madwifi-source should only recommend module-assistant (and not depend). As an alternative, the packa

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-22 Thread Kel Modderman
Julien Valroff wrote: Package: madwifi-source Version: 0.svn20060207 Severity: wishlist As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in README.Debian, I think madwifi-source should only recommend module-assistant (and not depend). As an alternative, the package could depend on m-a O

Bug#354000: madwifi-source: Should only recommend module-assistant

2006-02-22 Thread Julien Valroff
Package: madwifi-source Version: 0.svn20060207 Severity: wishlist As 2 build methods are clearly supported and explained in README.Debian, I think madwifi-source should only recommend module-assistant (and not depend). As an alternative, the package could depend on m-a OR kernel-package. Cheers