Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Can you please identify yourself as someone who has legal qualification to make the following assertions. I am concerned that any arbitrary Debian user can take offence to our license without reasonable legal grounds. I simply do not know who you are. I am a Debian Developer; without

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-02 Thread Ross Bencina
Hello Junichi Can you please identify yourself as someone who has legal qualification to make the following assertions. I am concerned that any arbitrary Debian user can take offence to our license without reasonable legal grounds. I simply do not know who you are. I've opened bugs now, I

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-02 Thread MJ Ray
Ross Bencina [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can you please identify yourself as someone who has legal qualification to make the following assertions. I am concerned that any arbitrary Debian user can take offence to our license without reasonable legal grounds. I simply do not know who you are.

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Package: audacity Severity: serious Hi, I'm filing a bugreport against audacity in case we forget at all. It kind of sneaked in; without a resolution this package should be removed from Debian. regards, junichi [1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)] On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Ross

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, Can you please identify yourself as someone who has final authority for giving this advice. I will be very surprised if Don satisfies that request. No debian decision is final: we reserve the right to find or admit bugs in the future, whether coding, usage or licensing. The most

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:15:05AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way. The possible options that I see are: 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian 2.

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way. The possible options that I see are: 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian 2. license text is modified so that it clarifies that

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 354898 wishlist severity 354899 wishlist thanks On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 06:41:19PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:15:05AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:57:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way. The possible options that I see are: 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:02:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: I think the word request is pretty unambiguous. Anyway, ambiguities regarding the meaning of a license aren't RC bugs. A significant ambiguity should be; if a genuine ambiguity exists (not merely a contrived one, eg. Pine's modify

Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates?

2006-03-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Ross Bencina wrote: Can you please identify yourself as someone who has final authority for giving this advice. As MJ Ray has already pointed out, I'm just acting in an advisory capacity here, explaining to you what ftp-master and/or the maintainer are likely to decide