[Rafal Jan Czlonka]
> I've just read the description of bug #324599, but the one I've found
> is quite opposite - checkbashisms fails to recognise functions where
> the word "function" is omitted, like first() or second ().
What's the problem? "foo() { bar; }" is not a bashism. All POSIX
shells
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.15
Severity: important
Hi.
I've just read the description of bug #324599, but the one I've found is
quite opposite - checkbashisms fails to recognise functions where the
word "function" is omitted, like first() or second ().
Regards,
rjc
-- System Information:
D
2 matches
Mail list logo
