Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-13 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
tags 358392 + patch thanks Joey, Here is a patch that fixes this bug. Please feel free to modify the patch as necessary as I know virtually nothing about Perl. I just wanted to see this annoying bug fixed. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto --- dh_pyt

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 13 mai 2006 à 21:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit : > tags 358392 + patch > thanks > > Joey, > > Here is a patch that fixes this bug. Please feel free to modify the > patch as necessary as I know virtually nothing about Perl. I just > wanted to see this annoying bug fixed. The pa

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-15 Thread Joey Hess
Josselin Mouette wrote: > The patch looks fine. > > However, we should be cautious with regard to such changes. With this > patch, dependencies like python-numeric (>= 24.2) will work, but it is > going to break the buildds as the arch-all package will be unavailable > as long as it hasn't been re

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 15:51 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > The patch looks fine. > > > > However, we should be cautious with regard to such changes. With this > > patch, dependencies like python-numeric (>= 24.2) will work, but it is > > going to break the buildds as the

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-15 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 15:51 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit : > >>Josselin Mouette wrote: >> >>>The patch looks fine. >>> >>>However, we should be cautious with regard to such changes. With this >>>patch, dependencies like python-numeric (>= 24.2) will work, but it is >>>going

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 19:11 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez a écrit : > I was working on a solution to #359996 and it occurred to me that there > was no easy way let dh_python do its thing *and* still get a versioned > dependency of the form: > > Package: python-foo > Depends: python2.3-foo (= source_v

Bug#358392: A patch to fix this bug.

2006-05-15 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Josselin Mouette wrote: > > They will be uninstallable if they depend from a package that hasn't > been rebuilt. > > You should be aware that we're going to change the way python modules > are packaged. This work should hopefully be finished at the end of > Debconf. It will solve your issue in a