Hi maks,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:18:14PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
rechecking the issues that were reported on #358397 and #362064
6) debconf note
a preinst warning of the update.
See Manoj's reply for concerns about note vs. question here. I also don't
see any reason why the note
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:40:09 -0500]:
I am assuming you are not trolling, but merely do not know the
behaviour of the image preinst script.
I know the behavior I observe in my systems. I have not read the code.
The difference is that first, if kernel image is
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well.
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 02:16:59 +0200, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:25:05 -0500]:
6) debconf note
a preinst warning of the
* Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:25:05 -0500]:
6) debconf note
a preinst warning of the update.
Not a note. A question asked, and action taken based on the
answer.
You mean like kernel-package's Heya, I'm unpacking the a new version of
the same kernel, so you better
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:18:14 +0200, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hello Manoj and vorlon! rechecking the issues that were reported on
#358397 and #362064
1)
hello Manoj and vorlon!
rechecking the issues that were reported on #358397 and #362064
1) fails to install on read-only /boot
this is correct and not yet checked, boot is assumed rw.
we currently fail to check that, but non standard setup.
2) overwriting yaird generated image
only happened in
6 matches
Mail list logo
